Topic

Section 249A

2 articlesLatest March 2026
Condonation of Delay in Tax Appeal | Reliance on Consultant Without Documentary Proof Constitutes Sufficient Cause : ITAT Bangalore
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Condonation of Delay in Tax Appeal | Reliance on Consultant Without Documentary Proof Constitutes Sufficient Cause : ITAT Bangalore

ITAT Bangalore condoned a 74-day delay in filing an income tax appeal because the assessee’s failure to receive the assessment order stemmed from a consultant’s negligence, even in the absence of formal engagement documents. This ruling affirms that reasonable reliance on professional advisors, when genuine and not negligent, qualifies as sufficient cause under Section 250(6) of the Income Tax Act - protecting taxpayers who act in good faith despite procedural gaps.

Section 253 Income Tax Act | ITAT Pune Condones 3-Year Delay in Tax Appeal Due to Leprosy and COVID-19 Lockdown : ITAT
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 253 Income Tax Act | ITAT Pune Condones 3-Year Delay in Tax Appeal Due to Leprosy and COVID-19 Lockdown : ITAT

ITAT Pune held that severe medical conditions (leprosy) and national emergencies (COVID-19 lockdown) constitute 'reasonable cause' under Section 253 of the Income Tax Act, justifying condonation of a 3-year delay in filing an appeal. This ruling sets a precedent for taxpayers facing genuine health crises or force majeure events, ensuring procedural justice in tax litigation.