Topic

Representation of People Act

4 articlesLatest 2 weeks ago
Section 86, Representation of People Act | Lack of notarisation and rubber-stamp attestations not fatal for peremptory dismissal of election petition : SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Section 86, Representation of People Act | Lack of notarisation and rubber-stamp attestations not fatal for peremptory dismissal of election petition : SC

The Supreme Court ruled that missing notarisation on Form-25 and rubber-stamp attestations do not automatically invalidate an election petition under Section 86 of the Representation of People Act. Such procedural defects are therefore not grounds for peremptory dismissal, safeguarding the petitioner’s right to contest the election result.

Section 82 RP Act | Only Contesting Candidates May Be Impleaded in Election Petitions; Non-Candidate Officials Excluded : J&K and Ladakh HC
Case Law Analysis
|Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court

Section 82 RP Act | Only Contesting Candidates May Be Impleaded in Election Petitions; Non-Candidate Officials Excluded : J&K and Ladakh HC

The High Court has ruled that Section 82 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, strictly limits parties to an election petition to contesting or returned candidates only. Non-candidate officials-even those accused of corrupt practices-cannot be joined as respondents, reinforcing that election petitions are not civil suits and must adhere to statutory exclusivity. This sharpens the boundaries of accountability in electoral disputes and impacts how petitioners structure their claims.

Section 117 RP Act | Mandatory Security Deposit at Filing Stage Non-Negotiable: Bombay HC Dismisses Election Petition for Procedural Lapse
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Section 117 RP Act | Mandatory Security Deposit at Filing Stage Non-Negotiable: Bombay HC Dismisses Election Petition for Procedural Lapse

Bombay High Court reaffirms that failure to deposit security for costs under Section 117 of the Representation of the People Act at the time of filing an election petition is fatal, dismissing the petition outright. The ruling underscores strict adherence to procedural timelines, impacting election dispute litigants who risk dismissal for non-compliance.