Topic

Remand Jurisprudence

3 articlesLatest 2 weeks ago
Special Judge Loses Cognizance Jurisdiction Once Charge-Sheet Omits PC Act Offences; Transferee Magistrate Must Pass Fresh BNSS Remand Orders : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis

Special Judge Loses Cognizance Jurisdiction Once Charge-Sheet Omits PC Act Offences; Transferee Magistrate Must Pass Fresh BNSS Remand Orders : Bombay HC

Bombay HC held that a Special Judge under the PC Act loses cognizance jurisdiction once the charge-sheet omits corruption offences. The transferee magistrate must pass fresh cognizance and remand orders under the BNSS; failure renders detention illegal. Two accused were released where the CBI charge-sheet dropped PC Act charges but the Special Judge retained the file without valid BNSS remand orders.

Discretion to remit under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC not automatic; must be exercised only when essential material is missing | Partition suit remand : SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Discretion to remit under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC not automatic; must be exercised only when essential material is missing | Partition suit remand : SC

The Supreme Court overturned a High Court order remanding a partition suit, emphasizing that an appellate court’s power to send a case back under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC is discretionary, not a matter of right. Remand is permissible only when the appeal lacks essential material needed for a decision. Litigants in civil appeals must therefore demonstrate a material deficiency before seeking remand.