Topic

regularization of employees

2 articlesLatest May 2026
Article 14 & Service Law | Daily Rated Employees Entitled to Regularization Under State Policy; MP HC Mandates Reasoned Decision Within 45 Days
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Article 14 & Service Law | Daily Rated Employees Entitled to Regularization Under State Policy; MP HC Mandates Reasoned Decision Within 45 Days

MP High Court directs authorities to consider daily rated employees' representation under the State's 2016 regularization policy, ensuring compliance with natural justice. The court mandates a reasoned decision within 45 days, reinforcing that arbitrary denial of benefits violates constitutional guarantees of equality and fair procedure for contractual workers.

Contempt Jurisdiction | Substantial Compliance Suffices; CAT Bars Merits Review of Compliance Orders : Central Administrative Tribunal
Case Law Analysis
|Central Administrative Tribunal

Contempt Jurisdiction | Substantial Compliance Suffices; CAT Bars Merits Review of Compliance Orders : Central Administrative Tribunal

The Central Administrative Tribunal ruled that contempt jurisdiction is limited to examining willful disobedience, not the merits of compliance orders. Contractual employees' substantial compliance with tribunal directions discharges contempt liability, reinforcing procedural fairness over substantive scrutiny.