Topic

Punjab Land Revenue Act

2 articlesLatest March 2026
Limitation Act 1963 | Inheritance Vests Immediate Ownership; Adverse Possession Claim Requires Proof of Ouster : Punjab & Haryana HC
Case Law Analysis
|Punjab and Haryana High Court

Limitation Act 1963 | Inheritance Vests Immediate Ownership; Adverse Possession Claim Requires Proof of Ouster : Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab & Haryana High Court ruled that inheritance confers immediate ownership rights, and a suit for possession is not barred by limitation unless ouster is proven. The court emphasized that co-owners retain their rights unless active exclusion is established, reinforcing the burden of proof on adverse possession claimants.

Section 45 PLA | Civil Court Jurisdiction Over Mutation Disputes Not Barred by Section 13 HVCL Act : Punjab & Haryana HC
Case Law Analysis
|Punjab and Haryana High Court

Section 45 PLA | Civil Court Jurisdiction Over Mutation Disputes Not Barred by Section 13 HVCL Act : Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab & Haryana High Court ruled that suits challenging mutation entries under Section 45 of the Punjab Land Revenue Act remain maintainable in civil courts, even against Gram Panchayats, unless the dispute involves land classification or vesting under the Haryana Village Common Lands Act. This preserves judicial recourse for landowners contesting revenue records without triggering statutory bars.