Topic

public law element

2 articlesLatest June 2026
Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Barred to Stall IBC Personal Insolvency Proceedings After Unexplained Decade-Long Delay : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Barred to Stall IBC Personal Insolvency Proceedings After Unexplained Decade-Long Delay : Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has ruled that filing a writ petition to obstruct ongoing personal insolvency proceedings under the IBC, after a delay of nearly ten years, is an abuse of process. The judgment reinforces that statutory adjudication under the IBC must prevail over belated public law challenges, setting a critical precedent for creditors and guarantors facing delayed constitutional challenges to insolvency triggers.

Article 14 | Public Insurers Must Provide Reasoned Decisions When Repudiating Claims, Ignoring Unchallenged Survey Reports Is Arbitrary : Calcutta HC
Case Law Analysis
|Calcutta High Court

Article 14 | Public Insurers Must Provide Reasoned Decisions When Repudiating Claims, Ignoring Unchallenged Survey Reports Is Arbitrary : Calcutta HC

The Calcutta High Court held that state-owned insurers cannot repudiate insurance claims by disregarding unchallenged survey reports or failing to articulate reasons, as this violates the constitutional mandate of fairness under Article 14. This ruling binds all public sector insurers to adopt transparent, evidence-based decision-making in claim assessments, reinforcing accountability in administrative action.