Topic

provisional appointment

4 articlesLatest May 2026
Restoration of Service Mandatory for GDS Employees Upon Invalidation of Provisional Appointment | CAT Ernakulam Upholds Right to Prior Post with Full Benefits Till Age 65
Case Law Analysis
|Central Administrative Tribunal

Restoration of Service Mandatory for GDS Employees Upon Invalidation of Provisional Appointment | CAT Ernakulam Upholds Right to Prior Post with Full Benefits Till Age 65

CAT Ernakulam rules that employees provisionally appointed and later invalidated must be restored to their original GDS position with all benefits, including pension and service continuity, up to the age of 65. The judgment reinforces that service rendered under provisional appointments cannot be retrospectively nullified, ensuring statutory protection for retired employees.

Seven Years of Unblemished Service | Provisional Appointment Subject to Pending SLP Becomes Regular; Promotion Eligibility Triggered : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Seven Years of Unblemished Service | Provisional Appointment Subject to Pending SLP Becomes Regular; Promotion Eligibility Triggered : Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has ruled that after seven years of continuous, unblemished service, an appointment made subject to the outcome of a pending Special Leave Petition can no longer be treated as provisional. Petitioners are now entitled to regularization and must be considered for promotion, irrespective of the unresolved SLP, affirming that prolonged service overrides conditional language in appointment letters.

Ossification Test Validates Retroactive Age Eligibility | Compassionate Appointment Reinstated After Delayed Medical Assessment : Calcutta HC
Case Law Analysis
|Calcutta High Court

Ossification Test Validates Retroactive Age Eligibility | Compassionate Appointment Reinstated After Delayed Medical Assessment : Calcutta HC

The Calcutta HC reinstated a compassionate appointment after an ossification test confirmed the petitioner was under 35 at the time of provisional appointment in 2021, despite later medical reports suggesting overage. The court held that a nearly five-year delay in finalizing the appointment, coupled with inconsistent medical assessments, rendered the termination prejudicial and violative of natural justice, setting a precedent for delayed compassionate appointments in government services.

Provisional Appointment Pending ST Verification | Umadevi Doctrine Applies to Graduate Teachers: Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Provisional Appointment Pending ST Verification | Umadevi Doctrine Applies to Graduate Teachers: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has ruled that candidates awaiting verification of their Scheduled Tribe status may be granted provisional appointments as government teachers under the Umadevi doctrine, provided they cooperate fully with the scrutiny committee. This ensures service continuity without prejudicing the outcome of caste certification, protecting constitutional rights to reservation while upholding procedural integrity.