Topic

proprietary rights

2 articlesLatest July 2026
Article 300A & Section 43(c) Maharashtra Tenancy Act | Landowners Must Exhaust State Representation Before Challenging Proprietary Rights in Court : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Article 300A & Section 43(c) Maharashtra Tenancy Act | Landowners Must Exhaust State Representation Before Challenging Proprietary Rights in Court : Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has ruled that landlords asserting proprietary rights under Article 300A must first submit a formal representation to the State under Section 43(c) of the Maharashtra Tenancy Act before seeking judicial intervention. This establishes a mandatory administrative gateway, preventing direct writ petitions and reinforcing procedural due process in land disputes involving tenancy restrictions.

Third-Party Property Rights | Perishable Goods in Cold Storage Cannot Be Withheld Over Landlord-Tenant Rent Dispute: Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Third-Party Property Rights | Perishable Goods in Cold Storage Cannot Be Withheld Over Landlord-Tenant Rent Dispute: Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court rules that proprietary rights of third parties over perishable goods stored in cold storage facilities prevail over contractual disputes between landlords and tenants. The court mandates immediate judicial intervention to prevent irreparable loss, emphasizing that withholding such goods violates fundamental property rights and necessitates urgent relief.