Topic

Proportionality Test

2 articlesLatest September 2026
Maharashtra Poisons Rules 18A & 18B struck down as arbitrary | Challenge to methanol poison rules under Arts 14 & 19(1)(g) : SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Maharashtra Poisons Rules 18A & 18B struck down as arbitrary | Challenge to methanol poison rules under Arts 14 & 19(1)(g) : SC

The Supreme Court held that Maharashtra Poisons Rules 18A and 18B, which mandated denaturing methanol to curb hooch tragedies, lack a proximate nexus to the objective and impose a disproportionate burden on industries, thus violating Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The ruling protects chemical manufacturers and traders from arbitrary state regulation while affirming the proportionality test in economic legislation.

Rule 3 Electricity Rules 2005 | Dynamic 'Unitary Qualifying Ratio' Ultra Vires Supreme Court Precedent: Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Rule 3 Electricity Rules 2005 | Dynamic 'Unitary Qualifying Ratio' Ultra Vires Supreme Court Precedent: Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court strikes down KERC's dynamic 'Unitary Qualifying Ratio' (UQR) based on total actual consumption, ruling it violates Rule 3 of Electricity Rules 2005 and contradicts the Supreme Court's Dakshin Gujarat judgment. The Court mandates KERC to reconsider captive plant eligibility thresholds after due consultations, ensuring compliance with statutory proportionality.