Topic

Project Affected Persons

3 articlesLatest July 2026
Maharashtra PAP Rehabilitation Act Section 3 | State Must Constitute Grievance Redressal Committee to Curb Illegal Land Allotments : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Maharashtra PAP Rehabilitation Act Section 3 | State Must Constitute Grievance Redressal Committee to Curb Illegal Land Allotments : Bombay HC

Bombay High Court directs Maharashtra to establish a State Level Grievance Redressal Committee under the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999, to address rampant illegal land allotments and pending grievances of project-affected persons (PAPs). The ruling mandates uniform criteria for land allotments to prevent arbitrariness and ensure statutory compliance.

Natural Justice in Land Allotment | Bombay HC Quashes Cancellation Without Hearing Despite Fraudulent Claims : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Natural Justice in Land Allotment | Bombay HC Quashes Cancellation Without Hearing Despite Fraudulent Claims : Bombay HC

Bombay High Court rules that cancellation of land allotment without affording a hearing violates principles of natural justice, even where fraudulent claims are alleged. The judgment underscores that procedural fairness is mandatory in administrative actions affecting property rights, regardless of the merits of the underlying dispute.

Maharashtra Rehabilitation Act | 33-Year Delay Bars Land Allotment Relief; Laches and No Retrospective Effect : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Maharashtra Rehabilitation Act | 33-Year Delay Bars Land Allotment Relief; Laches and No Retrospective Effect : Bombay HC

Bombay HC rules that the Maharashtra Project Affected Persons Rehabilitation Act, 1999, does not apply retrospectively, and a 33-year delay in claiming land allotment constitutes laches, barring relief. The judgment underscores that welfare legislation cannot override procedural timelines, impacting project-affected persons seeking rehabilitation benefits.