Topic

Police Service

2 articlesLatest 3 hours ago
Article 311(2)(b) | Mere Apprehension of Witness Influence Cannot Justify Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry : Punjab & Haryana HC
Case Law Analysis
|Punjab and Haryana High Court

Article 311(2)(b) | Mere Apprehension of Witness Influence Cannot Justify Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry : Punjab & Haryana HC

The court quashed an ASI's dismissal, ruling that unsubstantiated fears of witness influence cannot bypass a departmental inquiry under Article 311(2)(b). The petitioner is entitled to reinstatement with consequential benefits but not back wages, while the department retains the option to initiate a fresh inquiry or await the outcome of criminal proceedings.