#Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench quashed contempt proceedings against the IAF for paying pension to the first wife, ruling that an employer's undertaking to withhold pension must be explicit and unambiguous. The judgment clarifies that employers cannot be held in contempt unless their undertaking is clear, impacting succession disputes involving multiple claimants.

Madhya Pradesh High Court rules that a willful violation of a temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC empowers courts to attach the violator’s entire property interest, not merely the disputed land. The judgment also imposes civil imprisonment on all parties involved, setting a precedent for stricter enforcement in injunction breach cases.