Topic

Neighbourhood School

3 articlesLatest 2 weeks ago
RTE Act S. 12(1)(c) | Distance Norms Not Rigid Where Division Bench Ordered Removal for Unaided Schools & Academic Loss Looms : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

RTE Act S. 12(1)(c) | Distance Norms Not Rigid Where Division Bench Ordered Removal for Unaided Schools & Academic Loss Looms : Bombay HC

The court quashed cancellation of a Scheduled Caste child's RTE admission, holding distance norms cannot be rigidly enforced where a Division Bench ordered their removal for unaided schools and compliance would cost the child an academic year. The ruling affirms procedural barriers cannot override substantive educational access for disadvantaged groups.

Section 12(1)(c) RTE Act | Neighbourhood Schools Cannot Delay Admission After State Allotment; No Post-Allocation Eligibility Scrutiny Permitted : SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Section 12(1)(c) RTE Act | Neighbourhood Schools Cannot Delay Admission After State Allotment; No Post-Allocation Eligibility Scrutiny Permitted : SC

The Supreme Court has ruled that neighbourhood schools under the RTE Act must admit children immediately upon state allocation, with no authority to re-verify eligibility or impose procedural delays. This upholds Section 12(1)(c) as a non-negotiable statutory right, ensuring social integration and eliminating institutional gatekeeping that undermines Article 21A.