Topic

merger

2 articlesLatest September 2026
Tribunals Cannot Block First-Motion Scheme Merger Under Sections 230-232 Before Shareholder/Creditor Vote : NCLAT Chennai
Case Law Analysis
|National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

Tribunals Cannot Block First-Motion Scheme Merger Under Sections 230-232 Before Shareholder/Creditor Vote : NCLAT Chennai

NCLAT Chennai held that at the first-motion stage of a scheme merger under Sections 230-232 of the Companies Act 2013, tribunals cannot reject the scheme merely because shareholders and creditors have not yet voted; the matter must proceed to their approval. The ruling clarifies that premature tribunal interference undermines the statutory merger process and affects companies seeking amalgamations.

Section 149(2-A) TNCS Act | Seniority retained post-merger, writ premature if revision remedy exists : Madras HC
Case Law Analysis
|Madras High Court

Section 149(2-A) TNCS Act | Seniority retained post-merger, writ premature if revision remedy exists : Madras HC

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court ruled that employees of merged cooperative societies retain seniority from the merger date under Section 149(2-A) of the TNCS Act, 1983, and that a writ petition challenging show-cause notices is premature when a revision remedy exists. The decision safeguards seniority rights in cooperative mergers and curbs premature writ filings.