Topic

Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission

2 articlesLatest June 2026
Rule 3 Electricity Rules 2005 | Dynamic 'Unitary Qualifying Ratio' Ultra Vires Supreme Court Precedent: Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Rule 3 Electricity Rules 2005 | Dynamic 'Unitary Qualifying Ratio' Ultra Vires Supreme Court Precedent: Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court strikes down KERC's dynamic 'Unitary Qualifying Ratio' (UQR) based on total actual consumption, ruling it violates Rule 3 of Electricity Rules 2005 and contradicts the Supreme Court's Dakshin Gujarat judgment. The Court mandates KERC to reconsider captive plant eligibility thresholds after due consultations, ensuring compliance with statutory proportionality.

Electricity Act 2003 | KPTCL Cannot Unilaterally Revise Supervision Charges Beyond KERC’s Statutory Authority: Karnataka HC Orders Refund with 8% Interest
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Electricity Act 2003 | KPTCL Cannot Unilaterally Revise Supervision Charges Beyond KERC’s Statutory Authority: Karnataka HC Orders Refund with 8% Interest

The Karnataka High Court reaffirmed that only the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) holds statutory power under the Electricity Act, 2003 to fix or revise supervision charges for self-execution works. The Court quashed KPTCL’s unilateral fee revision and directed a refund of excess payments with 8% interest, reinforcing regulatory compliance over arbitrary executive action.