Topic

Investigative Powers

2 articlesLatest May 2026
Section 102 CrPC | Freezing Bank Accounts Requires Direct Nexus to Alleged Offence; Rs. 6.55 Crore Bank Guarantee Condition Invalid : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Section 102 CrPC | Freezing Bank Accounts Requires Direct Nexus to Alleged Offence; Rs. 6.55 Crore Bank Guarantee Condition Invalid : Bombay HC

Bombay High Court rules that investigative agencies cannot freeze bank accounts under Section 102 CrPC without establishing a direct link to the alleged offence. The court struck down a Rs. 6.55 crore bank guarantee condition for de-freezing, emphasizing that criminal proceedings cannot substitute civil recovery and must respect the presumption of innocence.

Blanket Bank Account Freezes Without Specified Crime or Amount Violate Proportionality | Karnataka HC Quashes Order Under Khalsa Medical Store Doctrine : Karnataka HC
|Karnataka High Court

Blanket Bank Account Freezes Without Specified Crime or Amount Violate Proportionality | Karnataka HC Quashes Order Under Khalsa Medical Store Doctrine : Karnataka HC

The Karnataka High Court struck down a police-directed bank account freeze that lacked any specification of the alleged crime, amount involved, or factual nexus to the account holder, affirming that such coercive measures must satisfy the triple test of legality, necessity, and proportionality. This ruling reinforces that financial freezing is not a default investigative tool and protects small business owners from arbitrary state action under Article 21 and 300A.