Topic

Interim Resolution Professional

3 articlesLatest September 2026
IBC Regulation 34 | Stay on CoC Constitution Limits IRP Fees to Pro Rata Basis for Functions Performed : NCLAT
|National Company Law Appellate Tribunal

IBC Regulation 34 | Stay on CoC Constitution Limits IRP Fees to Pro Rata Basis for Functions Performed : NCLAT

NCLAT rules that an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) is entitled only to proportional fees for duties performed during a stay on Committee of Creditors (CoC) constitution, rejecting claims for full statutory remuneration. The ruling clarifies that fee entitlement under IBC is contingent on actual functions discharged, not mere appointment duration.

Section 18 Limitation Act | IRP's Claim Admission During CIRP Not an Acknowledgment Extending Limitation : SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Section 18 Limitation Act | IRP's Claim Admission During CIRP Not an Acknowledgment Extending Limitation : SC

Supreme Court rules that admission of debt by an Interim Resolution Professional during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process does not constitute acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Financial creditors filing Section 7 IBC petitions after limitation expiry remain time-barred, regardless of moratorium or COVID extensions.