Topic

High Court Supervisory Jurisdiction

2 articlesLatest August 2026
Article 226 Writ Power Limited to Jurisdictional Errors, Not Factual Findings of Consumer Forums | Refund with 12% Interest Upheld : Punjab & Haryana HC
Case Law Analysis
|Punjab and Haryana High Court

Article 226 Writ Power Limited to Jurisdictional Errors, Not Factual Findings of Consumer Forums | Refund with 12% Interest Upheld : Punjab & Haryana HC

The Punjab & Haryana High Court held that a writ under Article 226 cannot disturb the factual determinations of a consumer forum, confirming the forum’s modified refund order with 12 % interest. This narrows supervisory review, impacting insurers and consumers under the CPA 2019.

CPC Order VIII Rule 1(3) | Proportionality Mandated Before Debarment from Evidence for Non-Deposit of Costs : MP HC
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

CPC Order VIII Rule 1(3) | Proportionality Mandated Before Debarment from Evidence for Non-Deposit of Costs : MP HC

The Madhya Pradesh High Court overturned a trial court’s order barring a defendant from leading evidence and cross-examining witnesses over a Rs. 2,000 cost non-compliance, ruling that such severe sanctions violate procedural fairness unless proportionate to the default. The judgment reinforces that minor procedural lapses cannot justify extinguishing fundamental rights to defend a suit, especially when the amount is later deposited.