Topic

FIRC

2 articlesLatest May 2026
Rule 5 Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 | Limitation for Refund of Unutilized Credit on Export of Services Begins at End of Quarter Upon FIRC Receipt : CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Rule 5 Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 | Limitation for Refund of Unutilized Credit on Export of Services Begins at End of Quarter Upon FIRC Receipt : CESTAT Chennai

CESTAT Chennai rules that for refund claims under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, the one-year limitation period under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act starts from the end of the quarter in which the Foreign Inward Remittance Certificate is received, not the invoice date. This clarifies a critical timing ambiguity for exporters and service providers claiming Cenvat credit refunds, ensuring compliance aligns with actual receipt of foreign payment.

Section 68 IT Act | Share Capital from Non-Resident Holding Company Exempt from Addition if Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness Proven : ITAT Delhi
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Section 68 IT Act | Share Capital from Non-Resident Holding Company Exempt from Addition if Identity, Creditworthiness, and Genuineness Proven : ITAT Delhi

ITAT Delhi rules that share capital received from a non-resident holding company cannot be taxed under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act if the assessee establishes the investor's identity, creditworthiness, and the transaction's genuineness through bank records and FIRC. This sets a precedent for protecting foreign investments from arbitrary additions where documentation is robust.