Topic

FIR not naming accused

2 articlesLatest May 2026
Section 483 BNSS | Bail Granted When Accused Absent from FIR and No Corroborative Evidence Exists: Allahabad HC
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

Section 483 BNSS | Bail Granted When Accused Absent from FIR and No Corroborative Evidence Exists: Allahabad HC

The Allahabad High Court granted bail to an accused not named in the FIR and lacking any forensic or eyewitness linkage to the crime, reinforcing that absence of prima facie evidence and investigative gaps override the gravity of the charge. This sets a critical precedent for pre-trial liberty where prosecution fails to establish even a minimal nexus between the accused and the offence.

SC/ST Act | Bail Granted Despite Custodial Confession Where Accused Not Named in FIR: Allahabad HC Sets Evidentiary Threshold
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

SC/ST Act | Bail Granted Despite Custodial Confession Where Accused Not Named in FIR: Allahabad HC Sets Evidentiary Threshold

Allahabad HC ruled that bail under the SC/ST Act cannot be denied solely on custodial confession if the accused is not named in the FIR and lacks direct evidence linking them to the crime. The court emphasized simple injuries and absence of firearm involvement, reinforcing that parity in bail grants must consider evidentiary gaps, not just statutory severity.