Topic

Executive Discretion

3 articlesLatest July 2026
Tahsil Declaration Criteria Must Be Strictly Followed | Bombay HC Directs State to Decide Vairag Proposal : Bombay HC (Circuit Bench at Kolhapur)
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Tahsil Declaration Criteria Must Be Strictly Followed | Bombay HC Directs State to Decide Vairag Proposal : Bombay HC (Circuit Bench at Kolhapur)

Bombay HC directs Maharashtra government to decide Vairag Taluka's tahsil declaration proposal within three weeks, emphasizing strict adherence to prescribed criteria and natural justice principles. The ruling underscores executive accountability in administrative reforms affecting local governance structures.

Natural Justice in Remission | Gravity of Offence Insufficient Without Custodial Conduct Analysis: SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

Natural Justice in Remission | Gravity of Offence Insufficient Without Custodial Conduct Analysis: SC

The Supreme Court has ruled that denying premature release to a life convict based solely on the gravity of the offence, without evaluating conduct in custody, violates the right to a reasoned decision under Article 21. This sets a binding precedent for all state parole and remission boards, requiring transparent, individualized assessments in every case involving life imprisonment.

Judicial Restraint in Retirement Age Policy | Delhi HC Upholds Executive Discretion Over Superannuation Under Article 14
Case Law Analysis
|Delhi High Court

Judicial Restraint in Retirement Age Policy | Delhi HC Upholds Executive Discretion Over Superannuation Under Article 14

Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the superannuation age of GREF/BRO medical officers, holding that retirement age policy is an executive prerogative beyond judicial review unless arbitrariness is proven. The ruling reaffirms that parity claims under Article 14 do not override policy decisions absent manifest discrimination.