Topic

Election Commission

4 articlesLatest September 2026
Section 31 RP Act | BLA Undertaking for Enumeration Forms Struck Down; Verification Liability Limited to Photograph Match in SIR : Delhi HC
Case Law Analysis
|Delhi High Court

Section 31 RP Act | BLA Undertaking for Enumeration Forms Struck Down; Verification Liability Limited to Photograph Match in SIR : Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court quashed the ECI's mandate requiring Booth Level Agents to undertake verification of enumeration forms in Special Intensive Revision, holding that Section 31 RP Act confines BLA liability to photograph matching. The court deemed the blanket undertaking requirement arbitrary as the statutory duty to verify electoral rolls rests with Booth Level Officers, not party-appointed agents.

24-hour seizure reporting, one-year investigation deadline and mandatory High Court sanction for withdrawing election prosecutions | Election Commission powers under Art 324 : SC
Case Law Analysis
|Supreme Court of India

24-hour seizure reporting, one-year investigation deadline and mandatory High Court sanction for withdrawing election prosecutions | Election Commission powers under Art 324 : SC

The Supreme Court ruled that the Election Commission may compel seizure reports within 24 hours, must complete investigations within a year, and cannot withdraw election-related prosecutions without High Court permission, tightening controls on black-money influence in elections. This binding directive applies to all future election cases across India, affecting political parties, candidates and enforcement agencies.

Para 10B Election Symbols Order | 1% Vote Threshold Mandatory After Two Symbol Concessions : Madras HC Upholds Statutory Limit on Unrecognized Parties
Case Law Analysis
|Madras High Court

Para 10B Election Symbols Order | 1% Vote Threshold Mandatory After Two Symbol Concessions : Madras HC Upholds Statutory Limit on Unrecognized Parties

Madras High Court ruled that unrecognized political parties cannot claim a third common symbol without securing at least 1% of total votes polled in the state, reinforcing the Election Symbols Order's statutory threshold. The judgment clarifies that symbolic privileges are contingent on electoral performance, impacting smaller parties' visibility and campaigning rights.