Topic

Commission Agent

2 articlesLatest September 2026
Order VII Rule 14 CPC | Unfiled Internal Account Statement Inadmissible; Commission Agent Must Prove Actual Supply : Delhi HC
Case Law Analysis
|Delhi High Court

Order VII Rule 14 CPC | Unfiled Internal Account Statement Inadmissible; Commission Agent Must Prove Actual Supply : Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court set aside a ₹8.4 lakh decree for a commission agent, holding that an internal account statement not filed with the plaint is inadmissible under Order VII Rule 14 CPC. The agent must independently prove actual supply of X-ray films to government departments to claim commission; a limitation plea raised for the first time in appeal was rejected.

MPID Act Section 22 | Employee Receiving Commission May Be Charged With Criminal Conspiracy Even Without Direct Control Over Financial Scheme: Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

MPID Act Section 22 | Employee Receiving Commission May Be Charged With Criminal Conspiracy Even Without Direct Control Over Financial Scheme: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has ruled that an employee who receives substantial commissions and acquires assets from a fraudulent financial scheme can be prosecuted for criminal conspiracy under Section 120B IPC, even without direct control over the scheme’s operations. This sets a critical precedent for holding mid-level operatives accountable under the MPID Act, expanding liability beyond promoters and directors to complicit employees.

Continue exploring