Topic

Class-III employees

3 articlesLatest June 2026
Rafiq Masih Doctrine | No Recovery of Overpayment from Class-III Employees Without Fault: HP HC
Case Law Analysis
|Himachal Pradesh High Court

Rafiq Masih Doctrine | No Recovery of Overpayment from Class-III Employees Without Fault: HP HC

The Himachal Pradesh High Court barred recovery of erroneous overpayments from Class-III employees, even when no fault is attributed to them, reinforcing the Supreme Court’s Rafiq Masih ruling. The judgment mandates refund with interest if recovery is delayed, protecting lower-grade employees from financial hardship due to administrative errors.

Service Law | Erroneous Pay Fixation Recovery from Retiral Dues of Class-III Employees Impermissible : MP HC Mandates Refund with 6% Interest
Case Law Analysis
|Madhya Pradesh High Court

Service Law | Erroneous Pay Fixation Recovery from Retiral Dues of Class-III Employees Impermissible : MP HC Mandates Refund with 6% Interest

MP High Court rules that recovery of erroneous pay fixation from retiral benefits of Class-III employees violates service law principles, directing refund of Rs. 1.27 lakh with 6% interest. The judgment reaffirms that indemnity bonds or consent letters cannot override judicial precedents protecting lower-tier employees from administrative errors.