Topic

Central Excise Valuation Rules

3 articlesLatest May 2026
Rule 8 CEVR Exemption | Job Work Goods Consumed by Principal Not Subject to 110% Cost-Based Valuation : CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Rule 8 CEVR Exemption | Job Work Goods Consumed by Principal Not Subject to 110% Cost-Based Valuation : CESTAT Chennai

CESTAT Chennai rules that job-worked goods consumed by the principal manufacturer are exempt from Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, which mandates 110% cost-based valuation. The tribunal affirms valuation based solely on material and conversion costs, providing relief to job workers and principal manufacturers from additional duty liabilities.

Rule 7 Central Excise Valuation Rules | Transaction Value Must Reflect Actual Sale Price, Not Arbitrary 'Greatest Aggregate Value' : CESTAT Hyderabad
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Rule 7 Central Excise Valuation Rules | Transaction Value Must Reflect Actual Sale Price, Not Arbitrary 'Greatest Aggregate Value' : CESTAT Hyderabad

CESTAT Hyderabad ruled that excise duty valuation under Rule 7 must be based on the actual transaction value, rejecting the Department's demand predicated on the highest price of the week. The Tribunal emphasized the one-to-one correlation between factory clearance and depot sales, invalidating arbitrary valuation methods that disregard contractual agreements.

Rule 9 Central Excise Valuation | Transaction Value Cannot Be Rejected Solely Due to Related Party Status; Burden of Proof Lies with Revenue : CESTAT Chennai
Case Law Analysis
|Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal

Rule 9 Central Excise Valuation | Transaction Value Cannot Be Rejected Solely Due to Related Party Status; Burden of Proof Lies with Revenue : CESTAT Chennai

CESTAT Chennai clarifies that mere related-party status does not invalidate transaction value under Rule 9; the revenue must prove actual influence on price through concrete evidence. This ruling empowers manufacturers dealing with group companies to rely on arm’s-length pricing unless proven otherwise, reducing arbitrary reassessments in excise audits.