#bona fide requirement

Supreme Court reaffirms limited revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC, setting aside Punjab and Haryana High Court's interference with concurrent findings in a landlord-tenant dispute under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949. The ruling clarifies the threshold for eviction on bona fide grounds, impacting landlords and tenants in rent-controlled jurisdictions.

Supreme Court set aside the Punjab and Haryana High Court's interference with concurrent findings in a landlord-tenant dispute, emphasizing that revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC cannot be exercised to reappraise evidence. The ruling reinforces the high threshold for overturning concurrent judicial findings in rent control matters.

Gauhati High Court rules that a landlord’s bona fide requirement for self-employment suffices for eviction under the Rent Control Act, even without documentary proof of business plans. The court affirms that revisional jurisdiction under Section 115 CPC cannot re-examine concurrent findings unless they are perverse, setting a precedent for eviction disputes in Assam and neighboring states.

The Delhi High Court has ruled that a landlord’s residence abroad, OCI status of family members, or lack of permanent relocation does not undermine their claim of bona fide need for residential use under the Delhi Rent Control Act. This clarifies that the test for genuine requirement is intent and necessity, not physical presence or citizenship status - empowering landlords with overseas ties to seek eviction when genuinely needing the property for self-occupation.