#BNS Section 111

J&K High Court rules that economic offences alone cannot justify bail denial under BNS, emphasizing that completed investigations and charges outside the ten-year window under Section 111 BNS strengthen the case for release. The judgment reinforces that pre-trial detention must be justified on case-specific merits, not merely the nature of the offence.

Chhattisgarh High Court rules that mere financial defaults or vague threats, absent direct instigation or proximate conduct, fail to establish prima facie abetment of suicide under BNS Section 111. The court directs trial to proceed, emphasizing the need for evidence of intentional abetment beyond civil disputes.

Himachal Pradesh High Court holds that Section 111 of BNS requires at least two prior charge sheets with cognisance within ten years; absence renders offence non-attractable.