Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court
Section 11 Arbitration Act | Limitation Objections Must Be Decided by Arbitrator, Not Court: Bombay HC Reinforces Minimal Judicial Intervention
Bombay High Court rules that courts must refrain from adjudicating limitation objections under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, leaving such disputes exclusively to arbitrators. This decision aligns with the Supreme Court’s precedent in SBI General Insurance v. Krish Spinning, emphasizing legislative intent to limit judicial interference in arbitration proceedings and expedite dispute resolution.