Topic

Appellate Proceedings

6 articlesLatest June 2026
Natural Justice in Appellate Proceedings | Appellate Authority Must Hear Petitioners Before Vacating Interim Stay Under Cooperative Societies Act : Karnataka HC
Case Law Analysis
|Karnataka High Court

Natural Justice in Appellate Proceedings | Appellate Authority Must Hear Petitioners Before Vacating Interim Stay Under Cooperative Societies Act : Karnataka HC

Karnataka High Court rules that an appellate authority cannot vacate an interim stay without affording the petitioners a hearing, reinforcing natural justice as a constitutional mandate even for interim orders. The Court directed disposal of the appeal within three months while maintaining interim relief, setting a precedent for procedural fairness in service law disputes under the Cooperative Societies Act.

Natural Justice Violated | Order Against Deceased Party Is Nullity; Legal Successor Must Be Heard Under U.P. Land Revenue Act : Allahabad HC
Case Law Analysis
|Allahabad High Court

Natural Justice Violated | Order Against Deceased Party Is Nullity; Legal Successor Must Be Heard Under U.P. Land Revenue Act : Allahabad HC

Allahabad HC rules that an appellate order passed against a deceased party without hearing the legal successor is a legal nullity. The court emphasized that principles of natural justice mandate affording an opportunity of hearing to successors in land revenue appeals, setting a key precedent for procedural fairness in property disputes.

Rule 46A IT Rules | CIT(A) Must Give AO Opportunity to Verify New Evidence Before Admission: ITAT Delhi
Case Law Analysis
|Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

Rule 46A IT Rules | CIT(A) Must Give AO Opportunity to Verify New Evidence Before Admission: ITAT Delhi

ITAT Delhi holds that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) cannot admit new evidence under Section 250(4) without first complying with Rule 46A(3), which mandates the Assessing Officer’s examination and response. The ruling reinforces procedural fairness in appellate proceedings, ensuring revenue authorities are not bypassed in evidence evaluation.

Bail Conditions Override GSR 1993 | Convicted Accused Can Apply for Passport Pending Appeal : Bombay HC
Case Law Analysis
|Bombay High Court

Bail Conditions Override GSR 1993 | Convicted Accused Can Apply for Passport Pending Appeal : Bombay HC

Bombay HC rules that bail conditions permitting travel take precedence over GSR 1993 restrictions, allowing a convicted accused to apply for a passport during appeal pendency, provided it is deposited with the Investigating Officer. The judgment clarifies that statutory travel bans do not automatically bar passport applications if bail terms permit.