#ancillary relief

Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that a decree for return of goods cannot be treated as ancillary to monetary recovery and must be independently valued under the Suit Valuation Act. Failure to pay separate court fees for such relief results in its dismissal, impacting commercial litigants seeking recovery of both money and goods.

The Rajasthan High Court dismisses a writ petition as infructuous but directs correction of a demand draft's payee name, affirming courts can grant ancillary relief even when primary relief is no longer viable.