Bombay High Court holds that amendment seeking declaration of waqf status is permissible pre-trial if predicated on pleaded facts, even if time-barred, provided no prejudice arises.
Chhattisgarh High Court holds that amendment of plaint after evidence closure requires proof of due diligence; failure to record satisfaction renders order invalid.
Bombay High Court permits amendment of plaint at pre-hearing stage to include consequential relief where defendant failed to act after termination of agreement.
Bombay High Court holds that amendments to pleadings to assert res judicata and estoppel are permissible before trial if necessary for determining real questions in controversy.
Madhya Pradesh High Court holds that amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC must be permitted when possession claim is supported by evidence already admitted under Order 7 Rule 14(3).