All 100 questions of AIBE-20 (2025) Set A with the correct answer, an original explanation, and the exact bare-act provision a tap away. No negative marking. The qualifying cutoff is 45 of 100 for General and OBC, 40 of 100 for SC, ST and PwD.
AIBE 20 (XXI) Set A Answer Key 2025 with Solutions
Answer key at a glance
Question 1Criminal Law (IPC / BNS)
If a bailiff executes an eviction based on a civil court order later declared void for lack of jurisdiction, what protection does Section 78 of the Indian Penal Code provide?
AThe bailiff is punishable as the order was invalid from the beginning
BThe bailiff can be punished only with a reduced penalty
The bailiff is exempt if he acted in good faith under the order
DThe bailiff is required to compensate the evicted person
Why C. Section 78 of the Indian Penal Code protects a bailiff from criminal liability if he acted in good faith under a court order, even if the order is later found to be invalid, as long as he had no reason to believe the order was unlawful.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 2Criminal Law (IPC / BNS)
Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, what is the maximum number of consecutive days an offender may be kept in solitary confinement at a time?
ASeven
BTen
Fourteen
DTwenty-one
Why C. Under Section 56 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, solitary confinement shall not exceed fourteen consecutive days, as this is the maximum limit prescribed by law for such punishment.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 3Tort, Motor Vehicle & Consumer Protection
According to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, what is the fixed amount of compensation payable in the event of death caused by a motor vehicle accident under no-fault liability?
ATwenty-five thousand rupees
BFifty thousand rupees
COne lakh rupees
DSeventy-five thousand rupees
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 4Labour & Industrial Law
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): An employee can be deemed to be in continuous service for one year only if he has worked for 365 days in the preceding twelve months, without any interruption. Reason (R): Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, continuous service may also include periods of interruption due to sickness, accident, leave, lay- off, strike, or lock-out not caused by the employee’s fault. In the context of the above assertion and reason under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which one of the following is correct?
ABoth (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
BBoth (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
C(A) is true, but (R) is false
(A) is false, but (R) is true
Why D. Assertion (A) is false because Section 2A of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 explicitly allows periods of interruption such as sickness, accident, leave, lay-off, strike, or lock-out, if not due to the employee’s fault, to be counted toward continuous service; Reason (R) is true as it correctly states this legal principle, which overrides the rigid 365-day requirement.
Question 5Criminal Law (IPC / BNS)
Read the following statements and choose the correct option. Statement 1: Under the Indian Penal Code, if a person harbours an offender who has escaped custody for an offence punishable with imprisonment up to 3 years, he shall be punished with imprisonment up to 7 years. Statement 2: The law provides an exception for harbouring or concealing by the husband or wife of the offender. In the context of the above statements under the Indian Penal Code, which one of the following is correct?
ABoth Statements 1 and 2 are false
BOnly Statement 1 is true
Only Statement 2 is true
DBoth the Statements are true
Why C. Section 216 of the Indian Penal Code punishes harbouring an offender who has escaped custody, but only if the offence for which the person was in custody is punishable with imprisonment of seven years or more; it does not apply to offences punishable with up to three years. However, the law explicitly exempts a husband or wife from liability for harbouring or concealing their spouse, making only Statement 2 true.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 6Criminal Law (IPC / BNS)
If a person attempts an offence punishable with a maximum of 10 years’ imprisonment, what is the maximum years of imprisonment that can be imposed under Section 62 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?
Five years
BSeven years
CTen years
DThree years
Why A. Under Section 62 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, the maximum punishment for an attempt to commit an offence is half the maximum punishment prescribed for the completed offence, which in this case is five years.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 7Criminal Procedure (CrPC / BNSS)
A juvenile aged 14 years is brought before the court for an offence not punishable with death or imprisonment for life. Under which provision of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, will the case primarily fall?
Section 27
BSection 125
CSection 302
DSection 482
Why A. Section 27 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, provides that a Magistrate of the first class may try any offence not punishable with death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years, and since the offence is not punishable with death or life imprisonment, it falls within the jurisdiction of a Magistrate under this section.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 8Criminal Procedure (CrPC / BNSS)
Under Section 290(1) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, within how many days from the date of framing of charge can an accused file an application for plea bargaining?
A15
30
C45
D60
Why B. Under Section 290(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, an accused may file an application for plea bargaining within thirty days from the date of framing of charge, as this is the statutory time limit prescribed for initiating the plea bargaining process.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 9Criminal Law (IPC / BNS)
Under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, if a person is ordered to pay a fine of ₹4,000 but fails to do so, what is the maximum simple imprisonment the court may impose on the defaulter?
AOne year
Two months
CFour months
DSix months
Why B. Under Section 65 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, if a person fails to pay a fine, the court may impose simple imprisonment for a term not exceeding two months, regardless of the fine amount, unless the law specifically provides otherwise.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 10Criminal Procedure (CrPC / BNSS)
According to Section 18 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, what is the minimum period of practice as an advocate, required to be considered eligible for appointment as a Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor?
A3 years
B5 years
7 years
D10 years
Why C. Section 18 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, mandates that a person must have practiced as an advocate for not less than seven years to be eligible for appointment as a Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 11Evidence (IEA / BSA)
Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, when can facts that are otherwise irrelevant be considered relevant?
AOnly when they prove the guilt of the accused directly
BOnly when they form part of a dying declaration
When they are inconsistent with a fact in issue or relevant fact
DWhen they are part of an admission made in writing
Why C. Under Section 7 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, facts otherwise irrelevant become relevant when they are inconsistent with a fact in issue or relevant fact, as they help explain or constitute part of the same transaction or context.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 12Evidence (IEA / BSA)
What condition must be satisfied for prior evidence to be relevant under Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
AThe evidence must have been recorded in the presence of a jury
The proceeding was between the same parties or their representatives in interest
CThe evidence must have been published in a government gazette
DThe evidence must have been corroborated by expert opinion
Why B. Under Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, prior evidence is relevant only if the proceeding in which it was given was between the same parties or their representatives in interest, ensuring that the parties had a legitimate opportunity to cross-examine the witness in the earlier proceeding.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 13Evidence (IEA / BSA)
During a court trial, the defence lawyer objects to the admissibility of certain papers produced as evidence. The judge clarifies that only documents categorized as public documents under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, can be accepted without strict proof. Which category of documents would fall under public documents in this context?
ADraft agreements between individuals
BPersonal diaries of government officials
CInternal notes of a private company
Judicial and executive acts of public officers
Why D. Under Section 74 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, public documents include judicial and executive acts of public officers, as these are official records created in the course of public duty and are presumed authentic.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 14Evidence (IEA / BSA)
Which condition must be satisfied for things said or done by one conspirator to be admissible against others under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023?
AThe statement must be made after the conspiracy has ended
BThe statement must involve unrelated matters of personal benefit
There must be reasonable ground to believe a conspiracy exists
DThere must be proof that each conspirator personally committed the act
Why C. Under Section 48 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, any statement or act by one conspirator is admissible against others only if there is reasonable ground to believe that a conspiracy exists at the time the statement or act was made.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 15Criminal Procedure (CrPC / BNSS)
As per Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, if a Magistrate sentenced a person to two years’ imprisonment and a fine, what is the maximum imprisonment he may impose in default of payment of the fine?
A1 year
B2 years
6 months
D3 months
Why C. Under Section 30 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the maximum term of imprisonment that may be imposed in default of payment of a fine is six months, regardless of the original sentence, unless the law otherwise provides.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 16Constitutional Law
As per the Constitution of India, after the 86th Constitutional Amendment, which directive principle was modified to ensure early childhood care and education below the age of six?
AArticle 39
BArticle 41
CArticle 47
Article 45
Why D. Article 45 of the Constitution of India, as amended by the 86th Constitutional Amendment, was modified to provide for early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of six years.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 17Civil Procedure Code (CPC)
According to the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, who can direct the Court that passed the decree to take security when an execution order is challenged in appeal?
AOnly the High Court exercising writ jurisdiction
The Appellate Court hearing the appeal
CThe District Registrar of Property Records
DThe Police Authority of the concerned jurisdiction
Why B. Under Section 51 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the Appellate Court hearing the appeal has the authority to direct the Court that passed the decree to take security when an execution order is challenged in appeal.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 18Civil Procedure Code (CPC)
Under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, how many High Court Judges constitute the judicial membership of the Rule Committee?
Three Judges of the High Court
BTwo Judges of the High Court
CFour Judges of the High Court
DFive Judges of the High Court
Why A. Under Section 122 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the Rule Committee of a High Court shall include three Judges of that High Court as its judicial members, making this the mandatory composition prescribed by law.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 19Intellectual Property Law
According to The Copyright Act, 1957, what is ordinarily the maximum punishment for copyright infringement under Section 63?
Imprisonment up to three years and fine up to two lakh rupees
BImprisonment up to two years and fine up to one lakh rupees
CImprisonment up to five years and fine up to three lakh rupees
DImprisonment up to seven years and fine up to five lakh rupees
Why A. Under Section 63 of the Copyright Act, 1957, the ordinary punishment for copyright infringement is imprisonment up to three years and a fine up to two lakh rupees, as this is the statutory maximum prescribed for first-time offenders engaging in deliberate infringement.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 20Constitutional Law
As per the Constitution of India, a linguistic community in India seeks to preserve its unique script and literature. Which constitutional provision guarantees them the right to conserve the same?
AArticle 28(1)
Article 29(1)
CArticle 30(2)
DArticle 32
Why B. Article 29(1) of the Constitution of India guarantees any section of citizens having a distinct language, script or culture the right to conserve the same, without discrimination.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 21Civil Procedure Code (CPC)
Under Section 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, what is the maximum period of detention in civil prison for a decree amount exceeding ₹5,000?
ASix weeks
BTwo months
Three months
DSix months
Why C. Under Section 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the maximum period of detention in civil prison for a decree amount exceeding ₹5,000 is three months, as the law prescribes a fixed upper limit based on the decree amount, with higher amounts attracting longer but capped detention periods.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 22Civil Procedure Code (CPC)
Which of the following situation falls within Section 58(1)(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908?
ADecree for ₹1,800, detention up to three months
Decree for ₹3,500, detention up to six weeks
CDecree for ₹6,200, detention up to six months
DDecree for ₹10,000, detention up to one year
Why B. Section 58(1)(b) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, provides that where a decree is for a sum not exceeding five thousand rupees, the court may order detention in civil prison for a term not exceeding six weeks in default of payment, and the decree for ₹3,500 falls within this limit.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 23Civil Procedure Code (CPC)
A civil suit is filed against Ajay, and the court issues summons requiring him to appear. After receiving the summons, Ajay consults his lawyer to understand the timeline for filing his written statement of defence under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Within how many days from the date of service of summons must he submit his written statement?
Thirty days
BFifteen days
CSixty days
DNinety days
Why A. Under Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a defendant must file his written statement within thirty days from the date of service of summons, and this period is mandatory unless extended by the court for sufficient cause.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 24Civil Procedure Code (CPC)
How long does the registered address furnished under Section 14A(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, remain valid if not changed?
ASix years after final determination of the cause
BThree years after the institution of the suit
CTwo years after final determination of the cause
DFive years from the date of decree
Question 25ADR incl. Arbitration
According to Section 25(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, what happens if the claimant fails to submit his statement of claim without sufficient cause?
AThe tribunal adjourns the case indefinitely
BThe tribunal imposes a penalty but continues proceedings
CThe tribunal assumes the claim is admitted
The tribunal terminates the proceedings
Why D. Under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, if the claimant fails to submit his statement of claim without sufficient cause, the tribunal is mandated to terminate the proceedings.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 26Family Law
If a case is transmitted to the Central Government under Section 10 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, what is the time limit for solemnizing the marriage after its decision?
AOne month
BTwo months
CSix months
Three months
Why D. Under Section 10 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, if a case is transmitted to the Central Government, the marriage must be solemnized within three months of the Government's decision, as this is the statutory time limit prescribed for completing the solemnization after the decision is rendered.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 27Family Law
What is the maximum term of imprisonment prescribed under Section 31 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 for breach
ASix months
One year
CTwo years
DThree years
Why B. Section 31 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 prescribes a maximum term of one year for imprisonment for breach of a protection order issued under the Act.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 28Public Interest Litigation
Under which provision of the Indian Constitution can a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) be filed directly in the Supreme Court?
AArticle 21
Article 32
CArticle 226
DArticle 14
Why B. Article 32 of the Constitution of India grants the right to move the Supreme Court directly for the enforcement of fundamental rights, and this includes the filing of Public Interest Litigation by any public-spirited individual or organization on behalf of those whose rights are violated.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 29Land Acquisition Act
Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, what is the minimum period that must elapse between the publication of notice and the appearance of persons interested before the Collector?
ANot less than 7 days
BNot less than 60 days
CNot less than 15 days
DNot less than 30 days
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 30Criminal Procedure (CrPC / BNSS)
Under which provision can a citizen file a public case in the Court of Magistrate regarding issues of public interest?
ASection 302 of the Indian Penal Code
BSection 144 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 133 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
DSection 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Why C. Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 empowers a Magistrate to issue a conditional order for the removal of a public nuisance, and a citizen may approach the Magistrate to initiate such proceedings when a public interest issue, like a nuisance affecting the community, is involved.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 31Law related to Taxation
According to Section 44AA(2)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, a person carrying on business must maintain books of account if income from business or profession exceeds:
₹1,20,000
B₹50,000
C₹5,00,000
D₹10,00,000
Why A. Section 44AA(2)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 mandates that a person carrying on business must maintain books of account if the income from such business exceeds ₹1,20,000 in any previous year, as this is the statutory threshold set for mandatory accounting maintenance.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 32Intellectual Property Law
Under the Patents Act, 1970, which situation prevents a patent application from being published even after the expiry of the prescribed period?
AWhen the applicant has filed a request for early examination
When secrecy direction is imposed under Section 35
CWhen the patent has already been granted by the Controller
DWhen the applicant has requested for an extension of time
Why B. When a secrecy direction is imposed under Section 35, the patent application is prohibited from being published regardless of the expiry of the prescribed period, as the government may restrict disclosure for reasons of national security or public interest.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 33Criminal Procedure (CrPC / BNSS)
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): Any person having an interest in a newspaper declared forfeited, may apply to the High Court to set aside the declaration within two months of its publication in the Official Gazette. Reason (R): The Special Bench of the High Court to hear such applications must always consist of exactly three judges, regardless of the strength of that High Court. In the context of the above assertion and reason under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, which one of the following is correct?
ABoth (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
BBoth (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(A) is true, but (R) is false
D(A) is false, but (R) is true
Why C. Under Section 117 of the CrPC, a person with an interest in a forfeited newspaper may apply to the High Court to set aside the declaration within two months, but there is no requirement that the Special Bench must consist of exactly three judges — the composition is determined by the High Court's normal rules for constituting benches, not by a fixed number.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 34Evidence (IEA / BSA)
Read the following statements and choose the correct option. Statement 1: Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, admissions are generally relevant and may be proved against the person making them, but cannot ordinarily be proved by or on behalf of that person. Statement 2: An admission can still be proved on behalf of the person making it if it relates to the existence of a state of mind or body, made at or about the time when such condition existed, and is supported by conduct showing its truthfulness. In the context of the above statements under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which one of the following is correct?
ABoth Statements 1 and 2 are false
BOnly Statement 1 is true
COnly Statement 2 is true
Both the Statements are true
Why D. Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, an admission made by a person is generally admissible against them but not by them, unless it concerns a state of mind or body contemporaneous with the admission and is corroborated by conduct that affirms its truthfulness, which is a recognized exception to the general rule.
Question 35Law related to Taxation
Which type of allowance qualifies for deduction under Section 16(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961?
AHouse Rent Allowance granted by private companies
Entertainment Allowance granted to government employees
CTransport Allowance provided to all salaried persons
DLeave Travel Allowance given for domestic travel
Why B. Entertainment Allowance granted to government employees qualifies for deduction under Section 16(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as this section specifically permits a deduction for such allowance paid to employees of the Central or State Government, subject to the limit prescribed by the rules.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 36Contract, Specific Relief, Property & NI Act
Read the given statements and choose the correct option. Statement 1: Under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, a negotiable instrument made, drawn, accepted, or transferred without consideration creates no obligation of payment between the parties to the transaction. Statement 2: According to the same Act, if the consideration for which a negotiable instrument was issued fails in part, the holder in immediate relation is entitled to recover only the proportionate amount corresponding to the consideration actually received. In the context of the above statements under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, which one of the following is correct?
ABoth Statements 1 and 2 are false
BOnly Statement 1 is true
COnly Statement 2 is true
Both the Statements are true
Why D. Section 43 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, provides that a negotiable instrument made without consideration is void as between the parties, and if the consideration fails in part, the holder is entitled only to the proportionate value of the consideration actually received.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 37Environmental Law
In the following question, a statement is followed by two Conclusions, I and II. Statement: Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, when an offence is committed by a company, every person who was directly in charge of and responsible to the company at the time of the offence, as well as the company itself, is deemed guilty. However, a person may escape liability if he proves that the offence was committed without his knowledge or that he exercised due diligence to prevent it. Conclusions: I. A company as well as its responsible officers may be held liable for environmental offences under the Act. II. An officer of a company can never escape liability once the company is found guilty of an offence. In the context of the above Statement and Conclusions under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, which one of the following is correct?
Only Conclusion I follows
BOnly Conclusion II follows
CBoth Conclusions I and II follow
DNeither Conclusion I nor II follows
Why A. Section 15(2) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 imposes joint liability on both the company and the responsible officers, but explicitly provides a defence for officers who prove they had no knowledge of the offence or exercised due diligence to prevent it; thus, Conclusion I follows as it accurately states the liability framework, while Conclusion II contradicts the statutory defence and does not follow.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 38Law related to Taxation
Under Section 24(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, what percentage of the annual value of an income from house property is allowed as a standard deduction?
A20
B40
30
D50
Why C. Section 24(a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, allows a standard deduction of 30% of the annual value of income from house property, irrespective of actual expenses incurred, to account for repairs and maintenance.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 39Land Acquisition Act
After a government notification is issued for acquiring Mr. Mehta’s farmland under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, he notices that the income from his crops steadily decreases until the authorities finally take possession. He approaches the court claiming compensation for this reduction in profits. According to the Act, what type of loss is compensable in such a case?
ALoss due to falling land prices in the market
BLoss due to cancellation of tenant agreements
CLoss of employment in nearby areas
DBona fide diminution of profits due to acquisition process
Question 40Civil Procedure Code (CPC)
According to Section 35A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, what is the maximum amount a Court can award as compensatory costs in ordinary cases?
A₹2,000
B₹10,000
C₹5,000
₹3,000
Why D. Section 35A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, empowers the Court to award compensatory costs not exceeding ₹3,000 in ordinary cases for false or vexatious claims or defenses, and this amount is fixed by statute as the upper limit.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 41Contract, Specific Relief, Property & NI Act
According to the Indian Contract Act, 1872, when is the communication of an acceptance complete against the proposer?
AWhen the acceptor prepares the letter of acceptance
When it is dispatched beyond the control of the acceptor
CWhen it is delivered to the office of the proposer party
DWhen the proposer acknowledges receipt in his records
Why B. Under Section 4 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, the communication of acceptance is complete against the proposer when it is dispatched beyond the control of the acceptor, as the acceptance becomes effective at the moment it is put into the course of transmission, not when it is received.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 42Contract, Specific Relief, Property & NI Act
Rahul rents a shop in the city for running his retail business. Later, the landlord decides to terminate the lease. Since the lease is for purposes other than agriculture or manufacturing and there is no special contract between the parties, the landlord wonders how many days’ notice he must legally give under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, to end the lease. What is the required notice period?
AFive days’ notice
Fifteen days’ notice
CForty-five days’ notice
DSixty days’ notice
Why B. Under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, where a lease is for purposes other than agriculture or manufacturing and no special contract exists, the landlord must give fifteen days' notice to terminate the lease.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 43Contract, Specific Relief, Property & NI Act
According to the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, what is the maximum sentence of imprisonment that a Magistrate may pass in a summary trial under Section 143?
ASix months’ imprisonment
BTwo years’ imprisonment
One year’s imprisonment
DThree years’ imprisonment
Why C. Under Section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, a Magistrate conducting a summary trial for offences under Section 138 may impose a maximum sentence of one year’s imprisonment, as this is the statutory limit prescribed for such summary proceedings.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 44Company Law
In the following question, a Statement is followed by two Conclusions, I and II. Statement: As per Section 157 of the Companies Act, 2013 every company must, within fifteen days of receiving intimation under Section 156, furnish the Director Identification Number (DIN) of all its Directors to the Registrar with prescribed fees. Failure to comply attracts penalties. Conclusions: I. If a company fails to furnish the DIN, it can be penalized. II. Every officer of the company in default is also liable for penalties. In the context of the above Statement and Conclusions, which one of the following is correct?
AOnly Conclusion I follows
BOnly Conclusion II follows
Both Conclusions I and II follow
DNeither Conclusion I nor II follows
Why C. Section 157 of the Companies Act, 2013 mandates that a company must furnish the Director Identification Number within the stipulated time, and failure to comply attracts penalties; this liability extends to every officer of the company who is in default, making both conclusions legally valid under the plain text of the provision.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 45Cyber Law
Read the following Statements related to the Information Technology Act, 2000 and choose the correct option. Statement 1: Under the Information Technology Act, 2000, a Digital Signature Certificate may be suspended by the Certifying Authority on the request of the subscriber, an authorized representative, or if it is considered necessary Statement 2: Under the same Act, a Digital Signature Certificate can remain suspended indefinitely without providing the subscriber an opportunity of being heard.
ABoth Statements 1 and 2 are false
Only Statement 1 is true
COnly Statement 2 is true
DBoth the Statements are true
Why B. Under Section 24 of the Information Technology Act, 2000, a Certifying Authority may suspend a Digital Signature Certificate upon request by the subscriber or authorized representative, or if deemed necessary, but suspension must be followed by an opportunity to be heard; indefinite suspension without such opportunity violates the principle of natural justice.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 46Labour & Industrial Law
In the following question, a Statement is followed by two Conclusions, I and II. Statement: According to the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, the appropriate Government credits ₹15,000 to the Child and Adolescent Labour Rehabilitation Fund for each child or adolescent for whom the fine amount from the employer has been deposited. The amount in the Fund is deposited or invested in banks, and the interest accrued is also payable to the child or adolescent. Conclusions: I. The child or adolescent is entitled not only to the credited amount but also to the interest accrued on it. II. The Government is not required to deposit any money other than what is collected as fines from the employer. In the context of the above Statement and Conclusions, which one of the following is correct?
Only Conclusion I follows
BOnly Conclusion II follows
CBoth Conclusions I and II follow
DNeither Conclusion I nor II follows
Why A. The Statement explicitly states that the amount credited to the Fund, along with the interest accrued on it, is payable to the child or adolescent, which directly supports Conclusion I. Conclusion II incorrectly implies a limitation on the Government’s obligation to deposit only fine amounts, but the Statement does not exclude other possible sources of funding, so it cannot be concluded.
Question 47Criminal Law (IPC / BNS)
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, prescribes the death penalty for certain forms of gang rape. Reason (R): The purpose of this provision is to make all sexual offences non-bailable. In the context of the above assertion and reason, which one of the following is correct?
ABoth (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
BBoth (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(A) is true, but (R) is false
D(A) is false, but (R) is true
Why C. Section 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, prescribes the death penalty for certain forms of gang rape, making Assertion (A) true; however, the purpose of this provision is not to make all sexual offences non-bailable, as bailability is determined by separate provisions and the nature of the offence, making Reason (R) false.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 48Criminal Procedure (CrPC / BNSS)
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): Under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, if the proclaimed person appears within the time specified in the proclamation, the Court shall release the attached property. Reason (R): The attachment of property under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is intended to compel the appearance of the proclaimed person before the Court, not to permanently deprive him of his property. In the context of the above assertion and reason, which one of the following is correct?
Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
BBoth (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
C(A) is true, but (R) is false
D(A) is false, but (R) is true
Why A. Section 85 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides that attachment of property is a coercive measure to secure the presence of the proclaimed person, and upon their voluntary appearance within the stipulated time, the property must be released — confirming that the purpose is procedural compulsion, not permanent confiscation.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 49ADR incl. Arbitration
Read the given Statements and choose the correct option. A dispute arises between two companies regarding the enforcement of their arbitration clause. Examine the following statements: Statement 1: An arbitration agreement must be in writing, and it can be contained in a contract, an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams, or electronic communications. Statement 2: An arbitration agreement may be implied solely from the conduct of the parties, without any written record.
Only Statement 1 is true
BOnly Statement 2 is true
CBoth Statements 1 and 2 are true
DNeither Statement 1 nor 2 is true
Why A. Under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an arbitration agreement must be in writing, and writing includes agreements contained in documents exchanged by letter, telex, telegram, or electronic means, but it cannot be implied solely from conduct without any written record.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 50Professional Ethics & Contempt
In the following question, a Statement is followed by two Conclusions, I and II. Statement: According to the Advocates Act, 1961, when the term of a State Bar Council expires without an election, the Bar Council of India shall constitute a Special Committee consisting of the ex officio member of the State Bar Council as Chairman and two nominated members. The Special Committee has the power to discharge all functions of the State Bar Council until the new Council is constituted, and elections must be held within six months unless the period is extended by the Bar Council of India. Conclusions: I. The Special Committee is empowered to handle pending disciplinary matters of the State Bar Council. II. The Bar Council of India may extend the six-month period for holding elections to the State Bar Council, for recorded reasons. In the context of the above Statement and Conclusions, which one of the following is correct?
AOnly Conclusion I follows
BOnly Conclusion II follows
Both Conclusions I and II follow
DNeither Conclusion I nor II follows
Why C. Under Section 49(1)(c) of the Advocates Act, 1961, when a State Bar Council's term expires without election, the Bar Council of India may constitute a Special Committee to perform all functions of the State Bar Council, including disciplinary matters, until a new council is elected; and the Act explicitly empowers the Bar Council of India to extend the six-month election period for recorded reasons.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 51Law related to Taxation
Read the given statements and choose the correct option. Statement 1: Under the Income-tax Act, 1961, a deduction equal to 30% of the annual value is allowed while computing income from house property. Statement 2: Where the property has been acquired or constructed with borrowed capital, the maximum deduction for interest payable on such capital is capped at ₹2,00,000, subject to conditions.
ABoth Statements 1 and 2 are false
BOnly Statement 1 is true
COnly Statement 2 is true
Both the Statements are true
Why D. The Income-tax Act, 1961 permits a flat 30% deduction from the annual value of house property to account for repairs and collection charges, regardless of actual expenses, and allows a deduction for interest on borrowed capital used to acquire or construct the property, with a cap of ₹2,00,000 when the property is self-occupied and other specified conditions are met.
Question 52Family Law
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): Under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, a daughter in a Joint Hindu Family governed by Mitakshara Law becomes a coparcener by birth in Reason (R): This provision grants daughters the same rights, liabilities, and disabilities in coparcenary property as those of sons. In the context of the above assertion and reason under the Hindu Succession
Both (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
BBoth (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
C(A) is true, but (R) is false
D(A) is false, but (R) is true
Why A. Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended in 2005, confers upon daughters the status of coparceners by birth in a Joint Hindu Family governed by Mitakshara Law, with rights, liabilities, and disabilities identical to those of sons.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 53Contract, Specific Relief, Property & NI Act
As per the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an acceptance must be absolute and unqualified. What is the legal effect if an offeree’s response to a proposal introduces a new term?
AIt becomes a valid acceptance, and the new term is incorporated as a mere suggestion
BIt operates as a valid acceptance if the new term is not a material alteration
It constitutes a counter-proposal, thereby rejecting the original proposal
DIt suspends the original proposal until the new term is accepted or rejected by the proposer
Why C. Under Section 2 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, an acceptance must be absolute and unqualified; any addition or modification to the terms of the original proposal amounts to a counter-proposal, which operates as a rejection of the original offer.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 54Contract, Specific Relief, Property & NI Act
The Indian Contract Act, 1872, provides for specific situations where an agreement without consideration is not void. Which of the following agreements is valid despite the lack of fresh consideration?
AAn oral promise by ‘A’ to pay ‘B’ ₹5000 for a service ‘B’ voluntarily rendered to ‘A’ last month
BA written and registered promise by a husband, out of natural love and affection, to transfer a property to his wife
CA promise to subscribe ₹1 lakh to a public charitable fund
DA promise made by a minor upon attaining majority to pay a debt incurred during his minority
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 55Administrative Law
In the context of delegated legislation, the judicial doctrine that prevents a legislature from conferring “uncontrolled legislative power” on the administration is known as the doctrine of:
AUltra Vires
Excessive Delegation
CConditional Legislation
DSeparation of Powers
Why B. The doctrine of excessive delegation prohibits the legislature from transferring its core legislative functions to the executive without laying down clear standards or guidelines, as the Constitution requires that law-making power remain with the elected representatives and cannot be abdicated entirely.
Question 56Family Law
For a petition for nullity of marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on the ground that consent was obtained by fraud, what is a statutory bar to granting the decree?
AThe petition was filed more than six months after the discovery of the fraud
The petitioner has lived with the respondent as husband and wife after the discovery of the fraud
CThe fraud relates to the social status of the respondent’s family
DThe parties have not attempted reconciliation through a counselling center
Why B. Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a petition for nullity on the ground of fraud is barred if the petitioner, after discovering the fraud, has voluntarily lived with the respondent as husband and wife.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 57ADR incl. Arbitration
In the absence of an agreement between the parties, the arbitration proceedings are said to have commenced under Section 21 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996:
Aon the date of appointment of arbitrator
Bon the date the arbitration agreement is signed
on the date the request for reference is received by the respondent
Don the date the arbitral tribunal issues notice
Why C. Under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arbitration proceedings commence when the respondent receives the request for reference, as this is the moment the other party formally initiates the process and puts the respondent on notice of the claim.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 58Constitutional Law
Which of the following public interest litigations expanded Article 21 of the Indian Constitution to include right to enjoyment of pollution-free water and air?
Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar, (1991) 1 SCC 598
BNilabati Behera v. State of Orissa, (1993) 2 SCC 746
CSheela Barse v. Union of India, (1986) 3 SCC 596
DOlga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corporation, (1985) 3 SCC 545
Why A. The case established that the right to life under Article 21 includes the right to enjoy pollution-free water and air, as environmental degradation directly impairs the quality of life and violates the fundamental guarantee of living with dignity.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 59Public Interest Litigation
Which Public Interest Litigation case resulted in the Supreme Court of India laying down the principle of ‘Absolute Liability’?
M.C. Mehta v. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC 1086
BM.C. Mehta v. Union of India, 1988 SCR (2) 530
CM.C. Mehta v. Kamal Nath, (1997) 1 SCC 388
DM.C. Mehta v. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC 734
Why A. The principle of absolute liability was established under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, where the Supreme Court held that enterprises engaged in hazardous or inherently dangerous activities are strictly and absolutely liable for any harm caused, without exception or defense.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 60Administrative Law
In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court of India has pointed out that the rule of nemo judex in causa sua is subject to the doctrine of necessity?
ASahni Silk Mills (P) Ltd. v. Employees’ State Insurance Corporation, (1994) 5 SCC 346
BIn Re: Delhi Laws Act, AIR 1951 SC 332
J. Mohapatra & Co. v. State of Orissa, (1984) 4 SCC 103
DUnion of India v. G. Ganayutham, (1997) 7 SCC 463
Why C. The Supreme Court held that even though the rule against bias, nemo judex in causa sua, is fundamental to natural justice, it may be set aside when there is no alternative and the doctrine of necessity demands that a decision be made to prevent a breakdown of public function.
Question 61Civil Procedure Code (CPC)
As per Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for Res Judicata to be applicable on a subsequent suit, the former suit: I. has been finally decided. II. can only be instituted prior to the subsequent suit. III. relates to the same matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit. IV. is between the same parties, or between parties under whom they or any of them claim. Select the correct answer:
AI, II and III
BII, III and IV
I, III and IV
DI, II, III and IV
Why C. Section 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 requires that for res judicata to apply, the former suit must have been finally decided, must involve the same matter directly and substantially in issue, and must be between the same parties or those claiming under them; it does not require the former suit to have been instituted before the subsequent suit, only that it was decided first.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 62Civil Procedure Code (CPC)
Where the decree is for the payment of money, execution by detention in prison shall not be ordered unless, after giving the judgment-debtor an opportunity of showing cause, the Court is satisfied that the: I. judgment-debtor is likely to abscond or leave the local limits of the jurisdiction of the Court. II. judgment-debtor has, before the institution of the suit in which the decree was passed, dishonestly transferred any part of his property. III. decree is for a sum for which the judgment-debtor was bound in a fiduciary capacity to account. IV. judgment-debtor has, or has had since the date of the decree, the means to pay substantial amount of the decree and neglected to pay the same. Select the correct answer:
AI, II and III
BII, III and IV
I, III and IV
DI, II, III and IV
Why C. Under Section 51 of the CPC, detention in prison for non-payment of a monetary decree is permitted only if the judgment-debtor has acted dishonestly in relation to the debt, such as by transferring property fraudulently before the suit, or by being in a fiduciary capacity and failing to account, or by having the means to pay but deliberately neglecting to do so; mere likelihood of absconding is not sufficient unless combined with one of these wrongful acts.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 63Civil Procedure Code (CPC)
As per The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a decree ex parte can be set aside against a defendant: I. if he satisfies the Court that the summons was not duly served. II. if he satisfies the Court that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from appearing when the suit was called on for hearing. III. if he satisfies the Court that there has been an irregularity in the service of summons despite the fact that defendant had notice of the date of hearing and had sufficient time to appear and answer the plaintiff’s claim. IV. without notice being served on the opposite party. Select the correct answer:
I and II
BI, II and III
CI and IV
DI, II, III and IV
Why A. Under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, a decree ex parte may be set aside if the defendant proves that the summons was not duly served or that he was prevented by sufficient cause from appearing. Irregularity in service without lack of actual notice or opportunity to appear does not suffice, and setting aside a decree without notice to the opposite party is not permitted.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 64Evidence (IEA / BSA)
When is a confession made by a person in police custody admissible under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023?
AOnly if it is made voluntarily in writing
Only if it is made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate
COnly if it is supported by two independent witnesses
DOnly if it is recorded after the charge sheet is filed
Why B. Under Section 32 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, a confession made by a person in police custody is admissible only if it is made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate, as this ensures the voluntariness and integrity of the statement by removing the influence of police coercion.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 65Evidence (IEA / BSA)
Which Section of The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 pertains to opinions of experts?
ASection 38
Section 39
CSection 36
DSection 46
Why B. Section 39 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 governs the admissibility of opinions of experts on matters of foreign law, science, art, identity of handwriting or fingerprints, or other specialized subjects, as these opinions are relevant when the court needs assistance to form an opinion on such technical issues.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 66Evidence (IEA / BSA)
Which of the following statements is incorrect as per The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023?
AA contracts, in writing, with B, for the delivery of indigo upon certain terms. The contract mentions the fact that B had paid A the price of other indigo contracted for, verbally, on another occasion. Oral evidence is offered that no payment was made for the other indigo. The evidence is admissible
A agrees absolutely in writing to pay B one thousand rupees on 1st March, 2023. The fact that, at the same time, an oral agreement was made that the money should not be paid till 31st March, 2023, can be proved
CA enters into a written contract with B to work certain mines, the property of B, upon certain terms. A was induced to do so by a misrepresentation of B as to their value. This fact may be proved
DA orders goods from B by a letter in which nothing is said as to the time of payment, and accepts the goods on delivery. B sues A for the price. A may show that the goods were supplied on credit for a term still unexpired
Why B. Under Section 58 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, when a contract is reduced to writing, any prior or contemporaneous oral agreement that contradicts or varies its terms cannot be proved, unless the writing is itself ambiguous or incomplete; here, the oral agreement directly contradicts the written term, so it cannot be proved.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 67Family Law
As per The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, two persons are said to be within the “degrees of prohibited relationship” if: I. one is a lineal ascendant of the other, including relationship by adoption. II. one was the wife or husband of a lineal ascendant or descendant of the other, including relationship by half or uterine blood as well as by full blood. III. one was the wife of the brother or of the father’s or mother’s brother or of the grandfather’s or grandmother’s brother of the other. IV. the two are brother and sister, uncle and niece, aunt and nephew, or children of brother and sister or of two brothers or of two sisters. Select the correct answer:
AI, III and IV
BIII and IV
CII, III and IV
I, II, III and IV
Why D. Under Section 3(g) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, two persons are within the degrees of prohibited relationship if they are related by full blood, half blood, or uterine blood in any of the ways listed in I, II, III, and IV, including relationships by adoption, and these categories collectively define the prohibited degrees as a hard legal bar to marriage.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 68Constitutional Law
Which Article of the Constitution of India lays down the fundamental duty of every citizen to protect and improve the natural environment?
AArticle 48A
BArticle 39A
Article 51A(g)
DArticle 51A(h)
Why C. Article 51A(g) of the Constitution of India imposes on every citizen the fundamental duty to protect and improve the natural environment, including forests, lakes, rivers, and wildlife, and to have compassion for living creatures.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 69Family Law
The grounds for decree for dissolution of marriage under Section 2 of I. Whereabouts of the husband have not been known for a period of two years. II. Husband has been sentenced to imprisonment for a period of five years. III. Husband has failed to perform, without reasonable cause, his marital obligations for a period of two years. IV. Husband has neglected or has failed to provide for maintenance of his wife for a period of one year. Select the correct answer:
AIII and IV
BI and II
CI, II, III and IV
None of these
Why D. None of these are valid grounds for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, as the listed conditions do not match the statutory grounds prescribed therein, which include adultery, cruelty, desertion, conversion, mental disorder, leprosy, venereal disease, renunciation, and presumption of death — none of which correspond to the options provided.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 70Cyber Law
As per The Information Technology Act, 2000, “intermediary” means any person who on behalf of another person receives, stores or transmits that record or provides any service with respect to that record and includes: I. Telecom service providers II. Search engines III. Cyber cafes IV. Online-auction sites Select the correct answer:
AI and IV
BI and II
CI, II and IV
I, II, III and IV
Why D. Under Section 2(1)(w) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, an intermediary is defined broadly to include any person who receives, stores or transmits electronic records on behalf of another, and this explicitly covers telecom service providers, search engines, cyber cafes, and online-auction sites as they all perform intermediary functions in the transmission or storage of data.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 71ADR incl. Arbitration
Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which of the following orders is not appealable?
ARefusing to refer parties to arbitration under Section 8
Refusing to appoint arbitrator under Section 11
CRefusing to grant any measure under Section 9
DRefusing to grant an interim measure under Section 17
Why B. Under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an order refusing to appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 is not appealable because the Act explicitly limits appeals to specified orders, and refusal under Section 11 is excluded from the list of appealable orders to ensure minimal judicial interference in arbitration proceedings.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 72Professional Ethics & Contempt
Under Section 9A of The Advocates Act, 1961, a legal aid committee constituted by a Bar Council shall consist of:
ANot exceeding thirteen but not less than nine members
BNot exceeding eleven but not less than seven members
Not exceeding nine but not less than five members
DNot exceeding seven but not less than three members
Why C. Under Section 9A of the Advocates Act, 1961, a legal aid committee constituted by a Bar Council must consist of not less than five and not more than nine members, ensuring a balanced and manageable structure for delivering legal aid services while maintaining adequate representation.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 73Professional Ethics & Contempt
Which Section of the Advocates Act, 1961 provides for the disciplinary powers of the Bar Council of India?
ASection 35
Section 36
CSection 37
DSection 38
Why B. Section 36 of the Advocates Act, 1961 empowers the Bar Council of India to exercise disciplinary jurisdiction over advocates, including the power to investigate misconduct and impose penalties through its disciplinary committee.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 74Tort, Motor Vehicle & Consumer Protection
Match List I (General Defences in Tort) with List II (Leading Cases) and select the correct answer: List I: i. Act of God ii. Consent (Volenti non fit injuria) iii. Statutory Authority iv. Necessity List II: 1. Vaughan v Taff Vale Rail Co. (1860) 5 H & N 679 2. Kirk v Gregory (1876) 1 Ex. D. 55 3. Nichols v. Marsland (1876) 2 Ex. D. 1 4. Hall v. Brooklands Auto Racing Club (1933) 1 KB 205 Codes
Ai-1; ii-2; iii-3; iv-4
Bi-2; ii-3; iii-4; iv-1
i-3; ii-4; iii-1; iv-2
Di-4; ii-1; iii-3; iv-2
Why C. Act of God applies when damage arises from natural forces beyond human control, as in Nichols v. Marsland; consent means a plaintiff who voluntarily accepts a known risk cannot claim injury, as in Hall v. Brooklands Auto Racing Club; statutory authority protects actions authorized by law, even if they cause harm, as in Vaughan v Taff Vale Rail Co.; necessity permits interference with property to prevent greater harm, as in Kirk v Gregory.
Question 75Tort, Motor Vehicle & Consumer Protection
The Central Consumer Protection Council, as provided under Section 3(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, shall consist of:
Aa Chairperson and ten other members, or a Chairperson and such other members as may be prescribed
Ba Chairperson and five other members
a Chairperson and such other members as may be prescribed
Da Chairperson and ten other members
Why C. Under Section 3(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, the Central Consumer Protection Council is statutorily required to consist of a Chairperson and such other members as may be prescribed by the Central Government, ensuring flexibility in composition while maintaining a defined structural framework.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 76Constitutional Law
In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court of India hold that, the Preamble is not part of the Constitution?
AIn re: The Kerala Education Bill, 1957, AIR 1958 SC 956
BKesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, AIR 1973 SC 1461
In re: The Berubari Union and Exchange of Enclaves, AIR 1960 SC 845
DMinerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India, AIR 1980 SC 1789
Why C. The Supreme Court held that the Preamble is not a part of the Constitution and cannot be amended under the amending power, as it does not confer substantive powers or limitations but only expresses the objectives of the Constitution.
Question 77Constitutional Law
Which Article in the Constitution of India relates to the subject-matter of laws made by Parliament to give effect to treaties and international agreements?
AArticle 249
BArticle 251
Article 253
DArticle 255
Why C. Article 253 empowers Parliament to make laws for implementing any treaty, agreement, or convention with any other country, or any decision made at any international conference, association, or other body, without requiring state legislative consent.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 78Constitutional Law
In which of the following judgments was the issue of ‘right to privacy’ I. Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (AIR 1963 SC 1295) II. PUCL v. Union of India (AIR 1997 SC 568) III. Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. (2017) 10 SCC 1 IV. M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra (AIR 1954 SC 300)
AII, III and IV
BII and III
COnly III
I, II, III and IV
Why D. The right to privacy is a fundamental right inherent in the dignity and personal liberty guaranteed by the Constitution, and has been recognized and affirmed across multiple judgments that interpreted the scope of personal freedom under the Constitution.
Question 79Constitutional Law
Which of the following actions is required if territory is ceded to any other country by the Union of India?
AExecutive action of the Union of India
BPresidential proclamation, exercising constitutional power while issuing proclamation
CExecutive action of the Union of India, and then legislative enactment by the Parliament
Legislative enactment by the Parliament, and then executive action of the Union of India
Why D. Under Article 3 of the Constitution of India, the cession of Indian territory to a foreign country requires a legislative enactment by Parliament, as it amounts to a change in the territory of India, and such change cannot be effected by executive action alone.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 80Constitutional Law
The President has referred a question to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court, as per Article 143 of the Constitution of India, has advised the President accordingly. Can the advice given by the Supreme Court be considered as ‘judicial precedent’?
No, because it is not considered as a judgment
BYes, because it is considered as a judgment
CNo, because it is not pronounced in open court
DYes, because it is pronounced in open court
Why A. No, because it is not considered as a judgment; Article 143 of the Constitution of India empowers the Supreme Court to give advisory opinions, which are not binding judgments and do not create judicial precedent.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 81Constitutional Law
In a criminal trial of defamation, the trial court, i.e., the High Court, has restrained publication of any news on the given case. Which of the following constitutional powers has been exercised by the High Court while passing given order?
APower to issue the writ of mandamus
BPower to issue the writ of prohibition
CInherent power
DResiduary power
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 82Constitutional Law
The Supreme Court of India has declared that ‘Right to Information’ is a fundamental right of every citizen of India. Which of the following stated provisions is used as source of the fundamental right given by the Supreme Court?
AArticle 19(1)(b), Constitution of India
BRight to Information Act, 2005
Article 19(1)(a), Constitution of India
DArticle 19(1), Constitution of India and Right to Information Act, 2005, collectively
Why C. The Right to Information is derived from Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, which guarantees the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression, as access to information is essential for the meaningful exercise of this freedom.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 83Constitutional Law
Which of the following Schedules of the Constitution of India deals with the subject matter of ‘Validation of certain Acts & Regulations’?
Schedule IX
BSchedule III
CSchedule V
DSchedule X
Why A. Schedule IX of the Constitution of India contains laws that are protected from judicial review on the grounds of violation of fundamental rights, as provided under Article 31B and validated by Section 9.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 84Constitutional Law
Consider the following statements regarding Article 32 of the Constitution of India: I. The Article is silent about the locus standi about who may approach the Supreme Court. II. The Article is silent about the opposite party against whom the relief under Article 32 may be granted. III. The Article creates room for even a sixth type of writ within its scope. Select the correct answer:
AI is false
BII is false
CIII is false
All Statements are true
Why D. Article 32 of the Constitution of India empowers the Supreme Court to issue writs for the enforcement of fundamental rights, and it does not prescribe limitations on who may approach the Court or against whom relief may be sought, nor does it restrict the nature of writs to only the five traditional types, thereby allowing flexibility for judicial innovation within its scope.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 85Administrative Law
By virtue of Articles 129 and 215, the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts in the States are courts of record and possess contempt Jurisdiction. What is true about the lower Judiciary in the same connection?
ALower Judiciary has to bear with its contempt
BLower Judiciary has to complain about its contempt to the Supreme Court of India
CLower Judiciary can itself punish the contemnor for having caused its contempt
The respective High Courts can take up the matter of such a contempt under whose jurisdiction the lower court falls
Why D. Under Article 129, the Supreme Court and High Courts are courts of record with inherent contempt jurisdiction, but lower courts derive their contempt powers only through the High Courts within whose jurisdiction they operate; thus, the respective High Courts can take up contempt matters concerning lower courts under their territorial and administrative control.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 86Professional Ethics & Contempt
The Supreme Court of India in R.K. Anand v. Registrar, Delhi High Court (2009) 8 SCC 106 held an advocate guilty of misconduct for:
Athreatening judges and use of abusive language during proceedings
Bfiling false affidavits and making reckless allegations against judges
interfering in a criminal trial by attempting to influence a witness
Dcirculating scandalous pamphlets against a sitting Chief Justice
Why C. Under Section 49(1)(c) of the Bar Council of India Rules, an advocate is guilty of professional misconduct for interfering in a criminal trial by attempting to influence a witness, as this violates the duty to uphold the integrity of judicial proceedings.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 87Family Law
Match List I with List II and select the correct answer using the codes given below: List I: i. Legitimacy of children of void and voidable marriages ii. Punishment of bigamy iii. Judicial separation iv. Voidable marriages List II: 1. Section 10, The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 2. Section 12, The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 3. Section 17, The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 4. Section 16, The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Codes
Ai-3; ii-4; iii-1; iv-2
Bi-4; ii-3; iii-2; iv-1
i-4; ii-3; iii-1; iv-2
Di-1; ii-2; iii-4; iv-3
Why C. Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 provides that children of void and voidable marriages are legitimate, regardless of the validity of the marriage; Section 17 makes bigamy punishable under the Indian Penal Code; Section 10 provides for judicial separation; and Section 12 deals with voidable marriages and their annulment.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 88Contract, Specific Relief, Property & NI Act
Under the Indian Contract Act, 1872, what happens if the principal debtor leaves part of the debt unpaid and there are two or more co-sureties?
AThe creditor alone bears the unpaid portion of the debt
BThe debtor’s family becomes liable for the unpaid amount
The co-sureties share the unpaid portion in equal contribution
DThe entire unpaid portion is to be paid by the surety first approached
Why C. Under Section 146 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, when there are multiple co-sureties for the same debt, they are liable to contribute equally to the unpaid portion, unless otherwise agreed.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 89Contract, Specific Relief, Property & NI Act
Under the Specific Relief Act, 1963, when can a defendant in possession of movable property be compelled to deliver it to the plaintiff?
When the property is held as agent or trustee of the plaintiff
BWhen the property is held as mortgaged asset of the plaintiff
CWhen the property is held as lessee or sub-tenant of the plaintiff
DWhen the property is held as co-owner in common with the plaintiff
Why A. Under Section 9 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, a defendant in possession of movable property may be compelled to deliver it to the plaintiff when the defendant holds the property as agent or trustee for the plaintiff, as this establishes a legal right in the plaintiff to immediate possession.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 90Administrative Law
Read the following statements and choose the correct option: Statement 1: Under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, a Joint Administrative Tribunal for two or more States exercises the same jurisdiction, powers, and authority as an Administrative Tribunal for those States. Statement 2: For the purposes of contempt, a Tribunal exercises powers similar to those of a High Court, and references to “High Court” in the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 are construed to include such Tribunals. In the context of the above statements under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, which one of the following is correct?
ABoth Statements 1 and 2 are false
BOnly Statement 1 is true
COnly Statement 2 is true
Both the Statements are true
Why D. A Joint Administrative Tribunal established under the Act possesses the same jurisdiction, powers, and authority as individual State Tribunals, and the law explicitly treats such Tribunals as having contempt powers equivalent to a High Court, with references to High Court in the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 deemed to include these Tribunals.
Question 91Constitutional Law
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): A Money Bill can be introduced only in the House of the People (Lok Sabha) and not in the Council of States (Rajya Sabha). Reason (R): The Council of States may only make recommendations on a Money Bill within 14 days, but the House of the People may accept or reject them, and in either case, the Bill is deemed to be passed. In the context of the above assertion and reason under Article 109 of the Constitution of India, which one of the following is correct?
ABoth (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
BBoth (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
C(A) is true, but (R) is false
D(A) is false, but (R) is true
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 92Company Law
A company, registered under The Companies Act, 2013, is required to file a declaration of commencement of business before starting operations. The directors ignore this obligation, and the firm commences business activities without filing the declaration. How much penalty can be imposed on the company by the Registrar concerned for such non-compliance?
A₹25,000
₹50,000
C₹75,000
D₹1,00,000
Why B. Under Section 10A of the Companies Act, 2013, if a company commences business without filing the declaration of commencement, the Registrar may impose a penalty of ₹50,000 on the company for such non-compliance.
Question 93Criminal Law (IPC / BNS)
If multiple offences carry different punishments but it is unclear which one has been committed, how does Section 72 of the Indian Penal Code
By imposing punishment for the offence with the lowest prescribed term
BBy applying punishment equal to the average of all possible offences
CBy leaving the choice of punishment to the prosecuting authority
DBy suspending the punishment until further clarification is made
Why A. Section 72 of the Indian Penal Code provides that when a person is convicted of one of several offences, but it is uncertain which one, punishment shall be imposed for the offence with the lowest prescribed term to ensure fairness and avoid excessive punishment in cases of ambiguity.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 94Labour & Industrial Law
Mr. X owns a bakery where he employs Y, a 16-year-old adolescent. At first, X gives Y every Sunday off as his weekly holiday. After two months, X decides to change the weekly holiday to Wednesday and pastes a notice about this change on the bakery wall. According to the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, this change is:
Avalid, since employers can change the holidays anytime by giving notice
invalid, since weekly holidays cannot be altered before completion of at least three months
Cvalid, since the adolescent is given a full day of rest every week
Dinvalid, only if the notice is not displayed in the establishment
Why B. Under Section 7 of the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, a weekly holiday for an adolescent worker cannot be altered until at least three months have passed since the last holiday was fixed; therefore, changing the holiday after only two months is invalid.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 95Tort, Motor Vehicle & Consumer Protection
Which person will not be treated as a consumer under the definition of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019?
AA person who purchases a refrigerator on instalments for home use
BA person who buys a television, partly paid and partly promised, for family use
A person who purchases goods for the purpose of resale or for any commercial purpose
DA person who uses furniture bought by a relative with the latter’s consent
Why C. Under Section 2(7) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, a person who buys goods for resale or for any commercial purpose is excluded from the definition of a consumer, as the Act protects only those who purchase for personal use or consumption.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 96Constitutional Law
Given below are two statements, one labelled as Assertion (A) and the other labelled as Reason (R). Assertion (A): The President of India has the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites, or remissions of punishment, or to suspend, remit, or commute the sentence of any person convicted of an offence in cases where the punishment is by a Court Martial or where the sentence is death. Reason (R): This power under Article 72 overrides and completely nullifies the powers of the Governor to commute or remit a death sentence under State law. In the context of the above assertion and reason under Article 72 of the Constitution of India, which one of the following is correct?
ABoth (A) and (R) are true, and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)
BBoth (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
(A) is true, but (R) is false
D(A) is false, but (R) is true
Why C. Article 72 empowers the President to grant pardons and related relief in cases involving Court Martial and death sentences, but it does not override or nullify the Governor's power under Article 161 to commute or remit death sentences; both powers coexist independently within their respective jurisdictions.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 97Family Law
In the following question, a Statement is followed by two Conclusions, I and II. Statement: Under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, a Magistrate may issue a protection order to prevent the respondent from committing acts of domestic violence, contacting the aggrieved person, alienating assets or stridhan without permission, or causing harm to her dependents. Conclusions: I. A protection order can cover not just physical violence but also financial and emotional aspects of domestic violence. II. The Magistrate has wide powers to restrict the respondent’s conduct to safeguard the aggrieved person and her dependents. In the context of the above Statement and Conclusions under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which one of the following is correct?
AOnly Conclusion I follows
BOnly Conclusion II follows
Both Conclusions I and II follow
DNeither Conclusion I nor II follows
Why C. The Act empowers the Magistrate to issue protection orders that extend beyond physical violence to include financial control, emotional abuse, and threats to dependents, reflecting a broad understanding of domestic violence; the scope of such orders inherently grants the Magistrate wide discretionary powers to restrict the respondent’s actions in order to ensure the safety and well-being of the aggrieved person and her dependents.
Question 98Tort, Motor Vehicle & Consumer Protection
According to the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, which factor determines the jurisdiction of the licensing authority in applying for a driving license?
AThe place where the applicant has family ancestral property
BThe place where the applicant has held a bank account for more than a year
CThe place where the applicant votes in local body elections
The place where the applicant ordinarily resides or carries on business
Why D. The jurisdiction of the licensing authority is determined by the place where the applicant ordinarily resides or carries on business, as this ensures that the licensing authority has direct oversight and responsibility over the applicant’s local compliance with road safety and vehicle regulations under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Question 99Criminal Law (IPC / BNS)
If a convict sentenced to life imprisonment is being considered for remission fractions under Section 57 of the Indian Penal Code, which equivalent term of years is applied by the court?
ATen years of imprisonment
Twenty years of imprisonment
CForty years of imprisonment
DFifty years of imprisonment
Why B. Section 57 of the Indian Penal Code provides that for the purpose of calculating remission, life imprisonment shall be deemed to be imprisonment for twenty years.
Tap to read the exact provision
Question 100Labour & Industrial Law
According to the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, under what circumstance is the completion of five years of continuous service not mandatory for payment of gratuity to an employee by his employer?
AVoluntary resignation from the post by the employee
BDismissal of the employee due to misconduct at work
Death or disablement of the employee due to accident or disease
DTransfer of the employee to another department within the same organization
Why C. Under Section 4 of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, the requirement of five years of continuous service is waived if the employee's employment terminates due to death or disablement caused by an accident or disease, as the law recognizes such events as exceptional circumstances warranting immediate gratuity payment.
The Bar Council of India typically declares the AIBE result about 30 to 40 days after the exam. Until then, this unofficial answer key lets you estimate your score immediately.
The passing cutoff is 45% (45/100) for General/OBC candidates and 40% (40/100) for SC/ST/PwD candidates.
No. AIBE has no negative marking, so every correct answer earns one mark while wrong or unanswered questions simply earn zero.
No. This is an unofficial answer key with detailed solutions, provided to help you estimate your score. Always verify against the official key published on allindiabarexamination.com.
Use the free score calculator. Enter the option you marked for each question, either as a quick answer sheet or one question at a time, and get your exact score, cutoff verdict, and subject breakdown instantly.
This is an unofficial answer key prepared for educational purposes and to help candidates estimate their score before the official result. Answers reflect our expert analysis and may differ from the final Bar Council of India key. Always verify against the official key at allindiabarexamination.com .